June 13, 2013 Subscribe/ Unsubscribe View Online Printer Friendly |
|||
Colorado’s ZNE Goose Lays Golden Eggs
With political acrimony in Washington expected to continue, state
and local governments cannot wait for the federal government to create
the badly needed jobs, economic activity, and resultant revenue needed
to sustain themselves; they must use the options available and undertake
the task on their own – and they can.
Colorado just took a giant step forward.The Centennial State is set to create more construction jobs, increase state and local government tax revenue, and move its housing market to Zero Net Energy (ZNE) – meaning homes that produce as much on-site energy as they consume!Thanks to the Colorado Energy Saving Mortgage Program, signed into law by Governor Hickenlooper on May 28, a homebuyer purchasing a new or renovated ZNE (HERS 0 rating) home is eligible for an $8,000 reduction on financing the total cost of their home mortgage. A new or renovated home that has a HERS rating greater than HERS 0, but less than HERS 50 (50% energy reduction), will also receive a mortgage reduction incentive. In addition to an $8,000 mortgage incentive, homebuyers will benefit further from lower energy bills, which can be used to offset any cost increase on a ZNE home. For example, $30,000 in improvements on a 2,200 square foot home, after the $8,000 incentive, would require an additional $94.53 in mortgage payments each month. The monthly energy savings, however, would be $154.00. That's a net savings of $59.47 a month.
Bill introduced by Senator Gail Schwartz, and Representatives Max Tyler and Mike Foote.
Under this new program, a homebuyer can receive an $8,000
incentive, and purchase a zero net energy home that is worth
substantially more – and at a lower annual cost than an equivalent
non-ZNE home.Example is based on a 30-year, 4% mortgage, and average home energy cost of $0.84/sf/year.
According to the analysis conducted by Architecture 2030, each $1 million in incentives will generate:
This program “has great support from the construction and financial
sectors, as we continue to work together to keep Colorado at the
forefront of renewable energy, clean tech and energy efficiency policy
nationally” said Senator Gail Schwartz.
With interest rates low, now is the ideal time to leverage state and local government incentives to generate local building sector jobs, increase tax revenue, and stimulate the growth of an affordable high-performance housing market. New York is following Colorado’s lead.On May 17th, Assemblywoman Barbara Lifton introduced a Zero Net Energy Tax Credit Bill in the New York State Assembly.
The bill, patterned after the ZNE program developed by
Architecture 2030, would give homebuyers a personal state income tax
credit for purchasing a new or renovated home equal to:
The tax credit would more that pay for itself – each $1 million
in tax credits would create approximately $27 million in total spending,
and generate over $3 million in state and local government tax revenue.
And in New Mexico,a Sustainability Tax Credit bill, introduced by Senator Peter Wirth, was passed and recently signed by the Governor. The bill provides personal and corporate income tax credits, for both new and renovated high-performance commercial and residential buildings.We encourage each state to get into the golden egg business with its own ZNE goose. For more information and a customized state ZNE Plan, contact Architecture 2030. |
Homeowner Associations And The Right To Solar Power
Homeowners’ right to solar and the solar industry’s fight to cut rooftop solar soft costs could both get a boost from a new effort to educate neighborhood associations.
“This makes the case for solar directly to homeowner association (HOA) members and their review committees,” explained author Philip Haddix of The Solar Foundation’s report, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: Encouraging Solar Development through Community Association Policies and Processes. “It tells them how they can allow more solar while fulfilling their responsibility to protect community interests and without ceding their authority.”
This issue is a subset of the soft cost discussion, Haddix said. “It is not quantified in the studies on soft costs but it is a permitting or planning and zoning issue. If there was a way to quantify this as a cost, it would be in the time lost dealing with the HOA.”
The opportunity is big. There are over 25 million housing units in HOA-governed communities and 52 percent of them (13 million) are suitable for residential solar, according to the report. An average-size solar system on just 5 percent of them would be “3.3 gigawatts, as much solar energy as was added in the entire U.S. in 2012.”
The major HOA concerns are:
Whether an HOA is pro-solar or flat out against it, Haddix said, rules that are clearly delineated produce a better outcome.
There are Solar Rights Provisions in twenty-two states, Haddix said. Though far from standardized, provisons help guide HOAs. “Generally, people are better off with solar rights laws because they don’t allow HOAs to prohibit solar,” Haddix said. “The homeowner automatically has the right to have a solar system.”
Solar Rights Provisions fall into four broad categories:
“In Garden Lakes Community Association vs. William Madigan, et al., the Arizona Court of Appeals found that the association’s requirement that homeowners adopt (what were ultimately considered) impractical or costly placement and screening measures ‘effectively prohibited’ the installation and use of a solar energy system, even though solar was not expressly prohibited by the community’s architectural guidelines.”
“The Court said the rule had the effect of prohibiting solar,” Haddix explained, “and the Arizona solar rights provision says an association can make ‘reasonable restrictions’ but can’t make rules that ‘effectively prohibit’ solar.”
Common elements in Solar Rights Provisions include:
Editor’s Note: EarthTechling is proud to repost this article courtesy of Greentech Media. Author credit goes to Herman Trabish.
World Class Supply Carries Green Building Materials
“This makes the case for solar directly to homeowner association (HOA) members and their review committees,” explained author Philip Haddix of The Solar Foundation’s report, A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: Encouraging Solar Development through Community Association Policies and Processes. “It tells them how they can allow more solar while fulfilling their responsibility to protect community interests and without ceding their authority.”
This issue is a subset of the soft cost discussion, Haddix said. “It is not quantified in the studies on soft costs but it is a permitting or planning and zoning issue. If there was a way to quantify this as a cost, it would be in the time lost dealing with the HOA.”
The opportunity is big. There are over 25 million housing units in HOA-governed communities and 52 percent of them (13 million) are suitable for residential solar, according to the report. An average-size solar system on just 5 percent of them would be “3.3 gigawatts, as much solar energy as was added in the entire U.S. in 2012.”
The major HOA concerns are:
- Community aesthetics
- Tree preservation and planting
- Health and safety
- Array size
- Array orientation
- Array tilt
- System shading
Whether an HOA is pro-solar or flat out against it, Haddix said, rules that are clearly delineated produce a better outcome.
There are Solar Rights Provisions in twenty-two states, Haddix said. Though far from standardized, provisons help guide HOAs. “Generally, people are better off with solar rights laws because they don’t allow HOAs to prohibit solar,” Haddix said. “The homeowner automatically has the right to have a solar system.”
Solar Rights Provisions fall into four broad categories:
- Type I: No Limits on Restrictions
- Type II: Undefined “Reasonable” Restrictions
- Type III: Qualified “Reasonable” Restrictions
- Type IV: Quantified Restrictions
“In Garden Lakes Community Association vs. William Madigan, et al., the Arizona Court of Appeals found that the association’s requirement that homeowners adopt (what were ultimately considered) impractical or costly placement and screening measures ‘effectively prohibited’ the installation and use of a solar energy system, even though solar was not expressly prohibited by the community’s architectural guidelines.”
“The Court said the rule had the effect of prohibiting solar,” Haddix explained, “and the Arizona solar rights provision says an association can make ‘reasonable restrictions’ but can’t make rules that ‘effectively prohibit’ solar.”
Common elements in Solar Rights Provisions include:
- Statement of Legislative Intent
- Voiding Prohibitions Against Solar
- Allowable Restrictions
- Applicability to Structures
- Awarding of Attorney’s Fees
- Grandfathering Clause
- HOA Policy Creation Mandate
- No Avoidance or Delay
- Provisions for Ground-Mounted Systems
- Improved processes and rules through understanding solar and how restrictions can negatively affect system performance
- Improved clarity, specificity, and accessibility of association solar guidelines
- Stakeholder meetings to produce practical guidelines that reflect community needs and values
Editor’s Note: EarthTechling is proud to repost this article courtesy of Greentech Media. Author credit goes to Herman Trabish.
World Class Supply Carries Green Building Materials